|
Home Act for Justice Real War Heroes Iraq News Presidential Finger Justice in Palestine Links to Justice Pelosi & War Crimes Republicans Say... Downing Street Memo Search this Website
|
Nineteen years ago,
Mordechai Vanunu, a technician at the secret nuclear weapons production
facility at Dimona in Israel, did something that he was right to do,
something that others with his knowledge of Israel's nuclear activities and
their implications for Israeli security and democracy and for world order
should have done earlier, or later. He revealed to his fellow citizens and
to the world truths about these activities that had long been wrongly
concealed and denied by his government.
What he revealed was not merely that Israel was a nuclear weapons state;
that had been known for more than a decade on the basis of widely-publicized
leaks in the U.S. about official American intelligence estimates to this
effect. Vanunu's photographs and interviews with the London Sunday Times
revealed that Americans and all others had substantially underestimated the
pace and scale of the Israel's secret and un-inspected production of nuclear
materials and warheads, especially since the early '70's. New estimates
on the basis of his revelations put the Israeli arsenal in 1986 at some 200
warheads (rather than 20), making it the third or possibly fourth largest
nuclear power, ahead of Britain and probably ahead of France. After nineteen
more years of production, that ranking remains valid, with Israeli probably
possessing closer to 400 weapons.
Did not Israelis, citizens of a democracy, and other nations of the world
deserve to know this? Was not his example of truth-telling, at great
personal risk, to be thanked and emulated? For a generation, the nuclear
scientist Joseph Rotblat, a founder of the Pugwash Movement for which he was
awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, has argued that the confidence required in
the inspection and enforcement agreements on nuclear disarmament could and
must rest in part on "societal verification": the courage and conscience of
scientists, technicians and officials who could reveal to inspectors
activities violating those agreements. Unhappily, the last 35 years since
the NPT went into effect have not seen many examples of such initiative,
other than that of Mordechai Vanunu. Yet the potential value of such
revelations, by someone willing, like Vanunu, to risk the heaviest personal
costs, is ever more clear.
Imagine, for example, if an Indian citizen aware of India's secret
preparations for nuclear testing and of the disastrous impact this would
foreseeably have on regional and world security had made this knowledge
unequivocally public in time for world opinion to come to bear to avert that
tragic error and the Pakistani testing it was sure to provoke. The result
for that person could well have been a long prison sentence, as it was for
Vanunu; yet surely such an act would deserve a Nobel Peace Prize, for which
Rotblat-using his prerogative as a Nobel Laureate-has nominated Mordechai
Vanunu repeatedly.
Now, a year after serving his full sentence of eighteen years-nearly twelve
of them spent in solitary confinement in a two-by-three meter cell-Vanunu is
under indictment and faces a return to prison for violating restrictions on
his freedom of speech that clearly violate his fundamental human rights. He
has and will continue to speak out in favor of a nuclear-free-zone in the
Middle East and the global abolition of nuclear weapons, telling whatever he
knows that supports these objectives. It is absurd to maintain, as the head
of Israel's security system does, that revelation of any further details he
learned from his access in Dimona nineteen years ago could undermine Israeli
national security, when no one has been able to identify any damage whatever
to Israeli security in the years since his revelations in 1986. Rather, the
prohibitions against his speaking to foreigners and to foreign journalists
on any matters, or to his fellow citizens on nuclear matters, are clearly
intended to extend his punishment in prison for unauthorized truth-telling
for an indefinite period.
The deterrent message to other potential Vanunus-either in Israel or
elsewhere-could not be more clear. In a world where more Vanunus are
desperately needed -above all, in my own country, the United States, and
other nuclear weapons states violating their Article VI obligations-is this
a message that the rest of the world should tolerate to be sent
unchallenged? In the interest of vital transparency and future societal
verification, there should be international protest of Vanunu's new
indictment and of the restrictions on his speech and travel.
It is time for the rest of the world to join Mordechai Vanunu in demanding
that Israel acknowledge its status as a nuclear weapons state with a large
and growing arsenal, and in demanding that ALL the nuclear weapons
states--including Israel, India and Pakistan, but above all the U.S. and
Russia--negotiate concrete steps on a definite time-table toward the global,
inspected abolition of nuclear weapons.
I feel compelled to add a personal note. In the early 1960's, as a
consultant to the Pentagon on nuclear command and control and nuclear war
plans, I was aware that the recent characterization [in the latest issue of
Foreign Policy] by Robert S. McNamara of our current nuclear policies was
just as valid then: "Immoral, illegal, militarily unnecessary and dreadfully
dangerous." That was demonstrated in classified documents I was reading, and
in some I was writing.
I regret profoundly that I did not reveal those documents to my fellow
Americans and the world at that time, though I would have gone to prison for
it, like Mordechai Vanunu. But I did not have his example of courageous
truth-telling then to awaken me to that responsibility. It is my hope that
people and governments will press the government of Israel now to free
Vanunu to speak throughout the world as a prophet of nuclear abolition.
To register protest over Vanunu's indictment or support for him, coordinate
through: Frederick Heffermehl, fredpax@online.no (Norway)
Daniel Ellsberg, the U.S. Department of Defense official who in 1971 leaked
classified documents subsequently known as the Pentagon Papers to The New
York Times, has recently published his memoirs: Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam
and the Pentagon Papers. |